Journey Experiences 01/20/2010
Post them here! Add your's by using the comments link, we aim to send them to Southeastern so they can learn what an average commuter has to endure every day just to get to work. CommentsKevin Parker Wed, 20 Jan 2010 5:08:49 am What a joke, the revised timetable means the chance of connecting to the 8:06 Cannon Street service at Paddock Wood is a thing of the past. Monday we achieved it, Tuesday we arrived well after the service had left, today we arrived at the same time and had to watch it leave before we set foot on the bridge over. The staff at Paddock Wood are worse than useless, they say the service is not "connecting" despite the timetable saying different and in any case they have no platform staff to hold the Cannon Street train. The simple solution? return the 7:43 from Maidstone West to 7:39. David Miles Wed, 20 Jan 2010 7:28:53 am I wholeheartedly agree with the above, the new timetable is an absolute joke, it appears to be designed to drive people away from using the Medway Valley line, to instead having to drive, which as well as petrol costs means that you have to pay SouthEastern for parking - perhaps if we all do this SouthEastern hope to scrap the service due to lack of demand. Paul Harrop Wed, 20 Jan 2010 7:45:02 am I also had the misfortune to be on this train this morning. A couple of female passengers told me the same thing had been happening to them for the last fortnight (i.e. they had missed the Cannon St connection because the train from Strood/Maidstone West was late and the connection was not held). Laura Wed, 20 Jan 2010 8:38:37 am Tuesday 19th January 2010, 8:18 Maidstone East to London Victoria arrive to London 9:58. John Reid Wed, 20 Jan 2010 9:54:45 am Lets begin with general complaints and then follow up later with specifics: David Miles Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:15 am Another day, another fail for SouthEastern, for the third of four consecutive days, Medway Valley line commuters who mistakenly thought that they might be able to use the service and get to work on time were proved to be wrong Pregnant and peed off!!! Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:03:35 am I too have experienced the worst commutes in 2010, in my 10 years of commuting to London. I don't believe I have had a journey home this year that hasn't taken me at least 2 hours due to train delays and problems getting to Victoria. I use to get either the 16:14 or the 19:14 from Cannon Street so my journeys home previously took 1hr 15 mins so the journey disbenefit quoted by Chris Mole is more than 15-30 mins. Last night when my train was delayed again (with only 4 carriages so we were like sardines) and yet again I got in too late to see my son before he went to bed, I burst into tears! I know it sounds dramatic (also struggling with being pregnant and the stress this is putting on me) but it is really effecting my life, I always said maximum commute for me should be 3 hours a day which is more than enough to get the 30 miles into London, but my journey is taking more like 4 hours a day. Chris Mole does not think of what it means to peoples lifes when he says a "journey time disbenefit"and then quotes incorrect numbers! 5 hours a week extra i am spending due to poor services into the City where I work. The worst journey I have had this year took 4.5 hours!!! I am really mourning the loss of the 16:14 and 19:14 from cannon street and can't believe demand for these services were too low, there were more than 200-300 people on these services that got off at west malling and maidstone east each day. I don't have a car and have tried many alternative routes on the trains but nothing seems to save me any time. It seems that Southeastern have made no connections easy as they are trying to push people onto the high speed trains by getting rid of any services that could possibly compete with these. I am at a loss of what to do apart from move from an area I am happy in. I am at breaking point! Paul Harrop Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:33:28 am They've run out of complaints forms @ Maidstone West but there were still a few left @ Paddock Wood ! Michelle Ward Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:51:21 am Since the removal of the fast Maidstone East to Cannon Street service, I too have been forced to rely (for want of a better word!) solely on the Medway Valley Line/Paddock Wood service. I would guess that since the introduction of the revised timetable on 13 December, I can count the number of times I've made the 0806 Cannon Street train from Paddock Wood on one hand. And I suspect the number of times I have caught the 0743 from Maidstone West to Paddock Wood is no more than double that. Southeastern have effectively left Maidstone's commuters with no direct links to the City and are failing miserably to serve them with the only alternative left, being the Medway Valley Line service. They should reschedule the 0743 back to 0739, as on the previous timetable, and/or reschedule the 0813 Charing Cross from Paddock Wood service to call at London Bridge to give City commuters some chance of getting to work in a reasonable time! Not to mention reintroduce and extend into the rush hour the fast Maidstone East/Cannon Street trains the town deserves. Laura Thu, 21 Jan 2010 6:12:51 am Last night I was shocked that the 17.49 London Bridge to Sevenoaks ran on time! so I was able to catch the 18.18 to Otford. Kevin Parker Thu, 21 Jan 2010 6:58:43 am Congratulations South eastern, following my comments above you have now managed a hat trick with today’s 7:43 arriving at Maidstone East at 7:48, we feared the worst, the driver did his best to make up the time and as with yesterday we arrived at the same time as the cannon Street service as our doors opened the doors on the Cannon Street train closed. Let us see what happens tomorrow! Abbie Ranson Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:55 pm I thought I would give the new timetable a chance since it changed over but regardless of the bad weather and the revised timetable I've remembered exactly why I stopped commuting to and from Victoria some 7 or so years ago - it takes forever! Having commuted for over 13 years the Cannon Street service to Bearsted was excellent for those of us who work in the East of London and the City. The morning train I could get off at London Bridge and walk to Tower Hill or cross over the bridge and catch a connecting train to Cannon Street and in the evenings walk back to Cannon Street for the 16.14 or 19.14. This week I have been late every single day, I shouldn't have to catch an earlier train in order to get to work on time when there used to be a service in place that got me into London in under an hour! Glentanar Sat, 23 Jan 2010 1:52:10 am Yesterday I missed my coach so by necessity went to West Malling to find the 7:53 was cancelled at 5 minutes notice without any explanation. Michelle Ward Sat, 23 Jan 2010 4:04:05 am On 17 December, the 2049 from London Bridge to Tonbridge was running a few minutes late. Michelle Ward Mon, 25 Jan 2010 6:14:47 am The 0818 from Maidstone West arrived seven minutes late at 0825 this morning, missed the 0850 connection from Tonbridge and the 0902 (due to arrive at London Bridge at 0940) did not arrive until 0953. Total delay was 27 minutes. Yet again I was half hour late for work, with no explanation whatsoever as to why either train was delayed. Paul Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:15:12 pm For God's sake you lot stop whinging! I was on the 8.18 on 19 January. True half of the traction motors were not working but the train was pretty much on schedule until it reached Herne Hill when it was delayed by a bridge strike. You can't hold South Eastern responsible for this. Would you rather get there late than not at all. Tue, 26 Jan 2010 2:18:15 am Thanks for your comment Paul, which I think actually highlights the poor state of the service we get. When a statement such as Paul Tue, 26 Jan 2010 5:22:07 am If you are claiming that trains are regularly running 10 minutes late then you must be travelling on a completely different network to me. Gemma Tinton Tue, 26 Jan 2010 1:27:07 pm If some people are happy to pay more money for less services then more fool them!! People are rightly moaning as this is a shocking service for the country town of Kent. It should be improving with more services available not being reduced Phil Tue, 26 Jan 2010 3:53:34 pm Gemma Wed, 27 Jan 2010 9:05:10 am Someone from West Malling has found the link to South Eastern's performance figures for P10: Dave from Maidstone Wed, 27 Jan 2010 9:47:53 am Regarding the period when we had snow on the ground for a week or two, I think South Eastern did their best to run a reliable service and in many ways it was more reliable than normal. I understand why they introduced the emergency timetable although having the last train back at 9pm did make things difficult if you tried to do anything in the evening in London. Also the last train from Strood was 8pm so made it difficult to connect from the high speed line. Maxine Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:14:39 pm I work every weekend in the city (and yes, we do have a 24/7 culture in this country although I wonder if SE is aware of this). Yes engineering works are needed but every other weekend? Laura Fri, 29 Jan 2010 9:08:31 am On Wednesday it took me 2 1/2 hours to get home, a combination of cancelled and late trains. The first train to be cancelled was the 17.49 from London Brdige to Sevenoaks. I got the 18.12 which was packed and arrived in Sevenoaks in good time to make the 18.45 connection to Otford, only for this train to also be cancelled. When I got to Otford at 19.09 I should have had a 10 minute wait for a train but instead the 19.19 was 10 minutes late. I got back to Maidstone just before 8pm having left my desk at 5.30. keith Sat, 30 Jan 2010 9:15:42 am It is difficult to add anything new to the comments that have been made. I have been travelling from Maidstone for over 20 years and can say that the service to London is now worse than it has ever been. Like hundreds of other people I need to get to the City. I do not want the extra time, cost and hassle of getting there via Victoria. Paul Mon, 01 Feb 2010 5:57:17 am New month new reliability ... no such luck! Michelle Ward Thu, 04 Feb 2010 3:43:19 am The 1749 from London Bridge to Paddock Wood was cancelled for the third time in a week last night - apparently due to "an earlier train fault". Three trains later, and half an hour late, I got home. This seems to be becoming far too regular an occurrence! Maxine Fri, 05 Feb 2010 3:33:45 am Since the beginning of January I have been unable to catch a direct train from London Victoria to Maidstone East when I finish work on Sunday evenings. The scheduled 22.45 train due at Maidstone an hour later has so far not materialised! Instead one has to change at Borough Green making the journey last 1 hour and 34 minutes. What happened to the direct train on offer in the new timetable? Mumblina Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:10:10 pm 1) Why does it take 1 hous and 15 minutes to get to London peak hours? For 38 miles in the year 2010 ? Jean Wed, 17 Feb 2010 2:11:36 am I regularly used to travel from Maidstone East to London Bridge at least 3 times a week, and now having to go to Victoria instead I find really annoying, the train takes forever and then I still have to get to London Bridge, how can they justify taking all fast trains off to London Bridge? this is the county town of Kent for goodness sake!! I am absolutely disgusted!!! Michelle Ward Wed, 17 Feb 2010 2:27:30 am The 0743 from Maidstone West missed the 0806 connection at Paddock Wood yet again this morning. This meant that to stand any chance of getting to work on time, London Bridge/Cannon Street passengers had to get the next train, which is fast to Waterloo East and Charing Cross, and therefore not a suitable connection. We cannot rely on Southeastern to get us to work on time any more, something that has become increasingly apparent over the past few months. And unfortunately, the only altnernative is slow overcrowed trains to Victoria - not a suitable option! The new timetable clearly does not work for Maidstone! And Southeastern's failure to make timetabled connections is just one of many examples as to why! Kevin Parker Thu, 18 Feb 2010 4:35:00 am Well we had a near miss last week when the morning 7:43 from Maidstone East was 6 mins late, but this time the driver announced the Cannon Street service was 16 mins late so we did not have to worry. Michelle Ward Thu, 18 Feb 2010 8:58:19 am As stated by Kevin, above, we clearly need to establish not only what exactly the connection policy is, but also how we go about ensuring a reasonable policy is implemented. Mike Aronson Tue, 23 Feb 2010 2:34:21 am I think that Maidstone has been treated in this way because it is not considered a regeneration or 'growth' town unlike Gravesend, Medway or Ashford. The town is hence forgotten by these decision makers. Mark Wed, 24 Feb 2010 7:02:19 am I've read through everyone's comments (both critical and supportive.) I've commuted from Maidstone into the City for over 10 years. When I moved to Maidstone from Bromley we considered anywhere within a radius of an hour or so and specifically settled on Maidstone as it had excellent links into the City. Indeed many of the newer housing developments were marketed on being under an hour to London. I feel really sorry for anyone who has invested in a property in Maidstone in the last 3 or 4 years on that basis and is now not even in a position to sell without losing money on the property. Annette Grimshaw Thu, 25 Feb 2010 2:42:33 am I used to be a commuter but now use the rail network for infrequent leisure travel. I lived in Tunbridge Wells until recently and cannot believe the difference between the T/W service to London and the Maidstone service. Maidstone is supposed to be the county town however the services are appalling. Now to add insult to injury they have removed the Maidstone to Charing Cross which is the service I always used. Charing Cross is more central than Victoria and this now adds 20 mins to my journey and an extra £5 to the cost. To make matters worse I consulted the National Rail Enquiries website prior to travelling which told me the Charing Cross service was still operating! As I had been misinformed I was unaware that my journey would take longer which meant that I was 20 mins late. Kevin Parker Thu, 25 Feb 2010 8:30:43 am No train at all today, the 7:43 was cancelled, another lat day into the office. Wendy Thu, 25 Feb 2010 9:01:50 am Maidstone is supposed to be the county town however the services are just appalling. Rob Cartlidge Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:48:53 am I've just been sitting on the 17:45 service from city thameslink to ashford and heard the words "will the conductor please contact the driver" !! Michael Southgate Thu, 04 Mar 2010 2:36:51 am I Live in Leeds and havent even bothered with the local services which are vastly overpriced and appallingly serviced. Instead I drive 30 minutes to a "Metro" service where I can park for free, enjoy a slightly less costly ticket and total commute time of 1:30.... Antony Fri, 05 Mar 2010 3:46:21 am A side issue for some perhaps but part of the journey experience on Southeastern. I wonder if anyone else feels that the number of public announcements on trains is excessive, and delivered at a volume that is intrusive? I have written several times to Southeastern to request that the announcements be reduced in number and volume, but to no avail. I pointed out that a five-day weekly commuter from Maidstone East to Brixton is subject to 320 announcements, which in my view are fatuous and intrusive. In their reply Southeastern acknowledged that the announcements can be "extremely irritating" (their words) but they did not intend to change their policy as these were of benefit to deaf and blind pssengers. I did not miss the opportunity of pointing out that these announcements were of extremely little value to the deaf, not to mention those of sound hearing. Will common sense ever prevail? Tue, 09 Mar 2010 4:37:52 am Southeastern are starting to come to the attention of the media and these stories will really help to push them into the limelight for just how poor their service has been not just since the new timetable. Richard Purves Mon, 15 Mar 2010 8:45:45 am The Dirty Tricks Department at Southeastern were working overtime this morning (15-Mar-2010). David Wed, 17 Mar 2010 6:03:48 am Something needs to be done, Maidstone and other stations along that line, needs a quick and reliable service into the city. I am seriously considering moving to a place with better connections. Stephanie Tue, 06 Apr 2010 5:44:43 am I am thinking of moving to Maidstone and would like some honest feedback on the train journeys from Maidstone East or Maidstone West (as I can get to my offices from Victoria or St Pancras). As Maidstone is a new area to me, my buying a property in the area depends solely on the train service. Andrew Williams Wed, 07 Apr 2010 1:06:41 am Well it's really time to cut to the chase, especially when there are those that suggest we should just grin and bear the perpetual delays and lack of communication. Since the removal of the direct service from Maidstone East to Cannon St/London Bridge in December, the remaining services have peculiarly got much worse. It means that many of us are unfortunately reliant on the Paddock Wood to Maidstone West service which especially at night is appalling. At least once a week the London train (typically the 18.50 from London Bridge) is delayed so that we miss the connection with the 19.40 from Paddock Wood to M/West. More often than not the London train gets in to Paddock Wood at 19.41 say or 19.42 but the 19.40 has already left. When you ask a guard they say that there may or may not have been communication between the respective drivers - sometimes there is and the train waits for a couple of minutes, but far more often the 19.40 has left. Two Wednesdays ago we got in to Paddock Wood at 19.41 having been stuck right outside Paddock Wood for 5 minutes but no-one had bothered to communicate so the 19.40 had already left. So we were all left stranded at Paddock Wood in the pi**ing rain and there were so many people that it was impossible for most of us to get a cab. So most of us waited an hour for the next service. Yet another night when you don't get to see your kids or loved ones because someone couldn't care less and couldn't be bothered to get the connecting train to wait for 1 minute. Quite simply, how do we get the train drivers/guards to communicate? As I've said, if we ask them face to face on the train they just sidestep the issue and say that "sometimes it haoppens, sometimes it doesn't". Such nonchalance will only continue to fuel the anger and disdain that we all feel as it is. Thu, 08 Apr 2010 3:25:11 pm Hi Stephanie Kevin Parker Wed, 14 Apr 2010 7:37:32 am Well we are slowly plunging backwards again, we had one 7 43 from Maidstone West cancelled. The last week had one in late it arrived at 7 46, the Driver told us not to worry he had spoken to the staff at Maidstone West and he was going to call Paddock Wood and get them to hold the on time 8 06 Cannon Street. Dave Fri, 16 Apr 2010 1:27:01 pm Does anybody know how we can influence the awarding of the franchise when up for renewal and bring to the authorities attention the complete contempt with which South Eastern treats Maidstone commuters? Surely we have a voice in this ? Andy Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:30:10 pm
Kevin Parker Mon, 26 Apr 2010 6:55:18 am Andy, Jonathan Wed, 05 May 2010 10:22:53 am Hi, John Tue, 11 May 2010 1:28:38 pm Nothing that the utterly useless train company shocks me any more. About a month ago there was a fatality in the West Malling area. I was surprised when SET divirted the train from Bromley South to Paddock Wood to allow people to get to the Maidstone area. Very impressed until I got to Paddock Wood (very exposed to the elements) on a cold wet night with around 30 other passengers. They never held the connection at Paddock Wood (this line hardly ever runs on time) which meant we had to wait for an hour and ten minutes (running ten mins late) in the cold. What they should of done was stop at Tonbridge where the Strood service starts. We could of sat on a train in the warm at a station with a coffee shop. When the train turned up late there was no apology. There must be a way of getting rid of SET altogether? It is such a poor company at ever level, a total failure. Now when my train is late and there is no annoucements I make a point of asking the guard why we are late, they are employed to assist us after all. Mon, 24 May 2010 6:07:41 am I experienced problems that night with Paddock Wood too, and I was in a rush for a important appointment so I had to ring a freind who lived 10 miles away to come and give me a lift. Not impressed at all. Kevin Parker Tue, 29 Jun 2010 6:46:48 am Well I have let the last few painful journeys slide by, but once again Monday 28th the 7:41 arrived at 7:48, once again we were given no explanation and needless to say we missed the Cannon Street service at Paddock Wood. Kevin Parker Tue, 13 Jul 2010 4:37:26 am Another day another complaint to South eastern:- Kevin Parker Tue, 13 Jul 2010 4:38:48 am This was the response to the same problem on the 9th July:- Trevor Smith Thu, 15 Jul 2010 7:04:55 am ONCE AGAIN - FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME THIS YEAR ALONE I AND MY FELLOW PASSENGERS- I HATE THE TERM CUSTOMERS- HAVE HAD TO ENDURE A ALMOST 3 HOUR JOURNEY INTO LONDON BECAUSE- ONCE AGAIN!- POINTS FAILURE. WE HAD TO TAKE AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE INTO LONDON VIA THIS STATION AND CHANGE AT THAT STATION...YOU KNOW THE SCENARIO. AND NO ONE SEEMS TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON WHEN YOU ASK Q'S LOKE "HOW LONG DO THINK THIS IS GOING TO TAKE TO FIX?" ONLY LAST WEEK I GOT HELD UP ON THE WAY HOME BECAUSE OF "A TREE ON THE LINE"- AGAIN!!!MY ANNUAL TICKET HAS COST ME ALMOST THREE AND A HALF GRAND AND STILL RISING AND FOR THAT I AM NOT ALLOWED TO USE THE HSI AS IT STATES "NOT VALID ON HSI" NUFF SED! TREVOR SMITH MR ANGRY OF MAIDSTONE Mike Sheerman Thu, 15 Jul 2010 1:52:53 pm Dear Sir /Madam Leave a Reply |