Menu:

 
Post them here!
Add your's by using the comments link, we aim to send them to Southeastern so they can learn what an average commuter has to endure every day just to get to work.  
 


Comments

Kevin Parker

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 5:08:49 am

What a joke, the revised timetable means the chance of connecting to the 8:06 Cannon Street service at Paddock Wood is a thing of the past. Monday we achieved it, Tuesday we arrived well after the service had left, today we arrived at the same time and had to watch it leave before we set foot on the bridge over. The staff at Paddock Wood are worse than useless, they say the service is not "connecting" despite the timetable saying different and in any case they have no platform staff to hold the Cannon Street train. The simple solution? return the 7:43 from Maidstone West to 7:39.

 

David Miles

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 7:28:53 am

I wholeheartedly agree with the above, the new timetable is an absolute joke, it appears to be designed to drive people away from using the Medway Valley line, to instead having to drive, which as well as petrol costs means that you have to pay SouthEastern for parking - perhaps if we all do this SouthEastern hope to scrap the service due to lack of demand.

The value of the service is demonstrated by the fact that a ticket from Maidstone costs the same as the service from Paddock Wood - SouthEastern obviously place zero value on the service else our tickets would reflect a value.

This week to have had two fails in three days pretty much sums up the whole situation with SouthEastern and the contempt that they hold for their customers

The service is unusable as it is - as Kevn states return the timetable in the morning back to as it was

Oh and reinstate the trains from Maidstone East to the City and the return journeys as well

 

Paul Harrop

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 7:45:02 am

I also had the misfortune to be on this train this morning. A couple of female passengers told me the same thing had been happening to them for the last fortnight (i.e. they had missed the Cannon St connection because the train from Strood/Maidstone West was late and the connection was not held).

According to the timetable there should be a 4 minute gap between the train from Strood arriving at Paddock Wood and the Cannon St train departing but in practice even Usain Bolt would struggle to cross the footbridge to catch the connection.

I agree with the above correspondent that the train from Strood and Maidstone West should revert to the old timetable and depart 4 minutes earlier ; even then the Cannon St connection was only guaranteed to work when the latter was late (which was quite often).

Missing the Cannon St connection and having to catch a later train to Charing X is particularly frustrating for those passengers who want to travel further east in London, especially as the fast trains from Ashford to Charing X and Cannon St via Maidstone E and West Malling have been scrapped and people now have to travel further west to Victoria on slower trains.

 

Laura

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 8:38:37 am

Tuesday 19th January 2010, 8:18 Maidstone East to London Victoria arrive to London 9:58.

This journey started off 10 minutes late to Maidstone,but ended up being 35 minutes late. The poor excuse this time, only half of the motors were working and we had to go at 5mph between Herne Hill and Brixton. 1 hour 40 minutes to get me to the wrong side of London where I then had to catch a severely delayed circle line and pay an extra £1.80. Bring back the 50 minute London Bridge service!

 

John Reid

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 9:54:45 am

Lets begin with general complaints and then follow up later with specifics:

1. Hardly any Blackfriars trains run to schedule.

2. Lack of information and clueless station staff. Last Monday 8th Jan an announcement was made that the Blackfriars to Ashford service was cencelled, the train turned up two minutes later.

3. Rubbish or no information on live departures board.

4. Ad hoc timetable changes. one day last week The West Malling to Blackfriars service which is normally fast from Bromley South, was without any notice turned into a slow service after Bromley.

5. Last Thursday 14 Jan amidst a load of cancellations the Victoria to Maidstone service which is normally 6-8 carriages was run as a 4 carriager which then stopped outside Bromley whilst we were crowded like sardines.

I would keep going but I'm off to catch the coach, at least I'm not putting money in SE Trains coffers.

 

David Miles

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:15 am

Another day, another fail for SouthEastern, for the third of four consecutive days, Medway Valley line commuters who mistakenly thought that they might be able to use the service and get to work on time were proved to be wrong

Once again, the 7.43 train from Maidstone West arrived late, meaning that those hoping to catch the 8.07 train from Paddock Wood were thwarted

When will SouthEastern admit that the new timetable is not fit for purpose, it is designed around the basic assumption that trains run on time, something that SouthEastern have proven time and again is something that they are incapable of

 

Pregnant and peed off!!!

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:03:35 am

I too have experienced the worst commutes in 2010, in my 10 years of commuting to London. I don't believe I have had a journey home this year that hasn't taken me at least 2 hours due to train delays and problems getting to Victoria. I use to get either the 16:14 or the 19:14 from Cannon Street so my journeys home previously took 1hr 15 mins so the journey disbenefit quoted by Chris Mole is more than 15-30 mins. Last night when my train was delayed again (with only 4 carriages so we were like sardines) and yet again I got in too late to see my son before he went to bed, I burst into tears! I know it sounds dramatic (also struggling with being pregnant and the stress this is putting on me) but it is really effecting my life, I always said maximum commute for me should be 3 hours a day which is more than enough to get the 30 miles into London, but my journey is taking more like 4 hours a day. Chris Mole does not think of what it means to peoples lifes when he says a "journey time disbenefit"and then quotes incorrect numbers! 5 hours a week extra i am spending due to poor services into the City where I work. The worst journey I have had this year took 4.5 hours!!! I am really mourning the loss of the 16:14 and 19:14 from cannon street and can't believe demand for these services were too low, there were more than 200-300 people on these services that got off at west malling and maidstone east each day. I don't have a car and have tried many alternative routes on the trains but nothing seems to save me any time. It seems that Southeastern have made no connections easy as they are trying to push people onto the high speed trains by getting rid of any services that could possibly compete with these. I am at a loss of what to do apart from move from an area I am happy in. I am at breaking point!

 

Paul Harrop

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:33:28 am

They've run out of complaints forms @ Maidstone West but there were still a few left @ Paddock Wood !

I'm looking forward to becoming unemployed in the next couple of months so I won't have to rely on this useless "service" any more !

 

Michelle Ward

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 2:51:21 am

Since the removal of the fast Maidstone East to Cannon Street service, I too have been forced to rely (for want of a better word!) solely on the Medway Valley Line/Paddock Wood service. I would guess that since the introduction of the revised timetable on 13 December, I can count the number of times I've made the 0806 Cannon Street train from Paddock Wood on one hand. And I suspect the number of times I have caught the 0743 from Maidstone West to Paddock Wood is no more than double that. Southeastern have effectively left Maidstone's commuters with no direct links to the City and are failing miserably to serve them with the only alternative left, being the Medway Valley Line service. They should reschedule the 0743 back to 0739, as on the previous timetable, and/or reschedule the 0813 Charing Cross from Paddock Wood service to call at London Bridge to give City commuters some chance of getting to work in a reasonable time! Not to mention reintroduce and extend into the rush hour the fast Maidstone East/Cannon Street trains the town deserves.

I have spent up to six hours' travelling to and from work each day over recent weeks (in fact one day seven hours!), having had to travel to either Victoria from Maidstone East, or London Bridge or St Pancras via Strood, when the Paddock Wood services have been disrupted, and even then was asked to pay an extended fare for the previlege of using the HS1 despite earlier trains having been cancelled! Many journeys have been unbearably cramped when disrupted services have turned up four to eight carriages shorter than scheduled.

To make things worse, communication from Southeastern has been appalling. Departure boards, station staff, websites and station announcements have all been providing conflicting, inaccurate information.

Yet I am paying an increased fare for this ever-deteriorating service!

 

Laura

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 6:12:51 am

Last night I was shocked that the 17.49 London Bridge to Sevenoaks ran on time! so I was able to catch the 18.18 to Otford.

However when I got there the 18.30 to Maidstone East was 12 minutes late and when it did arrive was only formed of 4 coaches so no seat home.

Then this morning the guard apologiesed for the delay to the train which was due to a "miscommunication between the guard and driver about what time they were starting"! Are there any trains that have run on time this week?

 

Kevin Parker

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 6:58:43 am

Congratulations South eastern, following my comments above you have now managed a hat trick with today’s 7:43 arriving at Maidstone East at 7:48, we feared the worst, the driver did his best to make up the time and as with yesterday we arrived at the same time as the cannon Street service as our doors opened the doors on the Cannon Street train closed. Let us see what happens tomorrow!

 

Abbie Ranson

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:55 pm

I thought I would give the new timetable a chance since it changed over but regardless of the bad weather and the revised timetable I've remembered exactly why I stopped commuting to and from Victoria some 7 or so years ago - it takes forever! Having commuted for over 13 years the Cannon Street service to Bearsted was excellent for those of us who work in the East of London and the City. The morning train I could get off at London Bridge and walk to Tower Hill or cross over the bridge and catch a connecting train to Cannon Street and in the evenings walk back to Cannon Street for the 16.14 or 19.14. This week I have been late every single day, I shouldn't have to catch an earlier train in order to get to work on time when there used to be a service in place that got me into London in under an hour!
Did any one else read the blog Lord Adonis wrote on his rail tour around Britain - noticeably he used the HS1 line to get back into London from Kent - funny that!

 

Glentanar

Sat, 23 Jan 2010 1:52:10 am

Yesterday I missed my coach so by necessity went to West Malling to find the 7:53 was cancelled at 5 minutes notice without any explanation.

The next train at 8:29 turned up with only 4 carriages so two train loads of commuters were crammed onto a short train like battery hens. so yet again we had a very hot and uncomfortable journey. At one point the conductor requested that some of the stops be missed out because of the crowding but SE Trains said no.

When you take the service reductions from the new timetable (8 per day?) cancellations in 2010 (average 4 per day?) and the shortened trains, SE Trains are running between 45 and 60 carriages less every single day.

Given the recent fare increases, we as passengers by accepting this are being treated as total mugs. SE Trains are raking it in and only paying minimal compensation to those who bother to complain.

This whole situation is offensive and totally disgusting

 

Michelle Ward

Sat, 23 Jan 2010 4:04:05 am

On 17 December, the 2049 from London Bridge to Tonbridge was running a few minutes late.

I knew it I would risk missing the 2133 connection to Maidstone West from Tonbridge so I phoned Southeastern and asked if the connection could be held, considering the next connection wasn't until 2233. The gentleman I spoke to contacted the control room and called me back to say they would try to hold it.

The train got into Tonbridge a few minutes late and the connection had gone. As a result, I had to wait at Tonbridge for the 2233, which was subsequently delayed and I finally got back to Maidstone at half past midnight! There were no cafes open, about six inches of snow fell during this time, and none of the station staff knew what was going on. When I queried why the connection wasn't held I was told it was their policy not to hold them as this was "disruptive" to the service! So how would they describe the situation they left me in? Had they held the connection, it would have meant a handful of passengers would have been a few minutes late. By not holding it, it meant 10s more people were delayed by nearly three hours. The reason I couldn't make the 2133 in time was because I was held up on yet another of Southeastern's late running services!

Clearly, they need to review their policy and run the service I am paying them for, which I cannot accept includes standing around cold stations for hours because they refuse to run their timetable! And it is about time the started compensating season ticket holders for the continuing disruption they cause to our day-to-day lives.

 

Michelle Ward

Mon, 25 Jan 2010 6:14:47 am

The 0818 from Maidstone West arrived seven minutes late at 0825 this morning, missed the 0850 connection from Tonbridge and the 0902 (due to arrive at London Bridge at 0940) did not arrive until 0953. Total delay was 27 minutes. Yet again I was half hour late for work, with no explanation whatsoever as to why either train was delayed.

 

Paul

Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:15:12 pm

For God's sake you lot stop whinging! I was on the 8.18 on 19 January. True half of the traction motors were not working but the train was pretty much on schedule until it reached Herne Hill when it was delayed by a bridge strike. You can't hold South Eastern responsible for this. Would you rather get there late than not at all.

15 comments and most of those seem to be from about 3-4 people - hardly the voice of the people is it!

 

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 2:18:15 am

Thanks for your comment Paul, which I think actually highlights the poor state of the service we get. When a statement such as

“True half of the traction motors were not working but the train was pretty much on schedule until it reached Herne Hill when it was delayed”

becomes acceptable the service is in a pretty poor state. Yes the delay at Herne Hill was out of the control of South Eastern, but the service was 10-15 minutes late arriving to Herne Hill in the first place. This might be ok if it was a one off, but trains are now regularly running 10 minutes late, many with no reason at all. Is this acceptable?

The state of the rolling stock is another matter altogether, toilets constantly locked out of use and doors that wont open are also a regular occurrence. Commuters have become so used to a poor service that these sorts of delays and breakdowns become the norm and people don’t feel that their comments will be heard if they complain, so they no longer bother to do so.

By asking people to openly post their complaints we hope to be able to challenge South Eastern as a group on issues facing commuters such as the lack of connecting trains at Paddock Wood. There may only be a few people leaving comments at the moment but it is a start!

 

Paul

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 5:22:07 am

If you are claiming that trains are regularly running 10 minutes late then you must be travelling on a completely different network to me.
My personal experience is that in recent years punctuality of the service has improved dramatically, particularly since South Eastern took over the franchise.
The state of the trains is very much down to the behaviour of the people who use them. Yes I agree I am not keen about sitting on a train where the floor is awash with coffee and I doubt that South Eastern are either - but what do you want them to do - take a train out of service for cleaning so you can moan it is only 4 cars rather than 8.
Considering the extreme weather we have recently experienced I think that South Eastern did their best. Agreed the information could have been delivered a little better but they made an effort to get you into work and home again.
Regarding ad-hoc timetable changes I was on the same West Malling to Blackfriars service that John Reid is complaining about. Operating conditions on that day were terrible and there had been numerous cancellations. Because of this I think South Eastern took the sensible decision to make the service serve all intermediate stations between Bromley and Blackfriars. I would be interested to hear from Mr Reid how he would have felt if he had been waiting for a train for over an hour at Shortlands and this train had sailed through! No doubt he would have written to complain! Incidentally he missed out on another golden opportunity to complain on this day since the same service got stuck at City Thameslink behind a failed FCC service!

PS - No I don't work for South Eastern but I do know what I'm talking about when it comes to transport logistics!

 

Gemma Tinton

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 1:27:07 pm

If some people are happy to pay more money for less services then more fool them!! People are rightly moaning as this is a shocking service for the country town of Kent. It should be improving with more services available not being reduced

I have written to the transport minister to highlight my long journeys into the city following the change to the timetable, and even when the evening trains from the city were completley full and needed. I have received a reply suggesting I firstly buy a car, drive up to 20 miles to a station that goes into the City and this is how I will get a good service.

So even though I live in the country town of kent which has 3 stations, and parking in the town centre where I live is a nightmare, I must buy a car and drive (not sure this meets with any green policies??) and this is what he suggests for the other 300 commuters in the area who want to go into the City and are effected by this service being cancelled.

Where does the minister suggest the 300 of us park out new cars as I don't any station could handle this increase???? Its madness

 

Phil

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 3:53:34 pm

Gemma

I have just been posting my own journey problems, that I experienced today, on the Malling website, then thought that it might be good to catch up on the MARUG one.

I must say that I am uttered appalled by the response that you have got from the Minister, regarding having to buy a car! I presume that you have written to Chris Mole, like so many of us have?

Is it at all possible that you could perhaps pdf or post a copy of this letter to Ann Widdecombe, Sir John Stanley, MARUG and MDTRA. This really is totally incredible. It totally defies belief.

Regards

Phil

West Malling

Fellow train sufferer

 

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 9:05:10 am

Someone from West Malling has found the link to South Eastern's performance figures for P10:

http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/index.php/cms/pages/view/593

A 54.5% punctuality average and a 97.5% average for P10 is not good at all. Does anyone know if the threshold for discounts applies to one months figures or the whole year?

 

Dave from Maidstone

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 9:47:53 am

Regarding the period when we had snow on the ground for a week or two, I think South Eastern did their best to run a reliable service and in many ways it was more reliable than normal. I understand why they introduced the emergency timetable although having the last train back at 9pm did make things difficult if you tried to do anything in the evening in London. Also the last train from Strood was 8pm so made it difficult to connect from the high speed line.

I've quite enjoyed experimenting with the many different ways of getting to Waterloo East, although clearly its very difficult compared to the previous 08:53 and 19:18 which used to work perfectly for me.

I've tried the Maidstone West-Paddock Wood-London Bridge train. My connection failed also due to a late train from Maidstone so ended up arriving at work at 10:10 rather than 9:30, a journey of 2 hours.

I've tried the 8:10 from Bearsted which takes FOREVER to get to Victoria, I get in to work about 9.50. I really hate travelling to Victoria so try and avoid it. The trains are crowded, unpleasant with constant station announcements and so very, very slow.

I also tried 101 bus and Chatham train to London Bridge. That worked quite well in the morning as the bus stops right outside the station but you are paying another £3.60 a day for the bus service.

My latest wheeze to try & avoid the Victoria service is to catch a train to Ashford from Bearsted at 8.14 which connects perfectly (if its on time) with the 8.43am HS1 service to St Pancras. Then walk downstairs to the Thameslink to Blackfriars and walk down. This clearly costs more money (£4.50 upgrade for the HS1) but it is quite a pleasant journey. Get to work by about 9.50 so the same time as going to Victoria.

On the way back I sometimes get the HS1 from St Pancras and connect at Strood.

But its all difficult and costly compared to how things were before Dec 13th. Maidstone has become a joke for rail commuters, except its not very funny!

 

Maxine

Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:14:39 pm

I work every weekend in the city (and yes, we do have a 24/7 culture in this country although I wonder if SE is aware of this). Yes engineering works are needed but every other weekend?

I really feel sorry for people struggling up to London 5 days a week because I find it stressful enough just trying to get to work weekends and losing the Cannon Street service has added two hour journey to my two-twelve hour days.

Oh and I don't drive(should get a tax rebate for my eco-credentials!)so I expect to be able to use adequate public transport!

Pathetic service!

 

Laura

Fri, 29 Jan 2010 9:08:31 am

On Wednesday it took me 2 1/2 hours to get home, a combination of cancelled and late trains. The first train to be cancelled was the 17.49 from London Brdige to Sevenoaks. I got the 18.12 which was packed and arrived in Sevenoaks in good time to make the 18.45 connection to Otford, only for this train to also be cancelled. When I got to Otford at 19.09 I should have had a 10 minute wait for a train but instead the 19.19 was 10 minutes late. I got back to Maidstone just before 8pm having left my desk at 5.30.

I wouldn't mind so much if this was a one off but the 17.49 has been cancelled again today or is "not stopping" as the journey checker website likes to call it. The reason, a fault on the previous train. I drove to Staplehurst this mornig so that I could get to an appointment for 7, now I wont make it on time and I probably wont get a seat either and I have paid £4 parking too!

ahhhhhhhhh!!!!!

 

keith

Sat, 30 Jan 2010 9:15:42 am

It is difficult to add anything new to the comments that have been made. I have been travelling from Maidstone for over 20 years and can say that the service to London is now worse than it has ever been. Like hundreds of other people I need to get to the City. I do not want the extra time, cost and hassle of getting there via Victoria.

last week I needed to get to the O2. It tokk nearly three hours for what amounts to a 35 mile trip.

Today my daughter tried to get from Maidstone to the West End. The only way to do it is via Strood and St Pancras. 4 hours after she left home she phoned to say that the Javelin has broken down in the tunnel and she had been abandoned at Ebbsfleet. They call this an International Station. There were no transport links to get from Ebbsfleet to Maidstone and no support from Southeastern staff. At least when they build the White Horse it will elevate Ebbsfleet to the status of a one horse town.

The real issue in all this is whether Maidstone takes its economy seriously. Nobody in their right mind would choose to live here. If it really does aspire to City status it has very long way to go in getting at least the transport infrastrucure sorted out.

 

Paul

Mon, 01 Feb 2010 5:57:17 am

New month new reliability ... no such luck!

Having written to Southeastern last month (with still no reply) over the bad service experienced on this line for the last few months, I was hoping for a real effort from the company this month. Last week alone commuters on the Maidstone East line experienced cancellations, elongated journey times of up to 50%, cramped carriages and filthy and vandalised toilets.

I was overjoyed to see the 06.59 to Bedford was running on time this morning. Even better than that, when I got on the train the heating was working :-)

As we pulled away from Kemsing (about 20 minutes into the 70 minute journey) I felt a shiver run down my spine as the tannoy sprang to life with those dreaded words "Can the conductor contact the driver please?"

Indeed my worst fears were realised when the conductor announced that the train would be terminating at Otford because of a problem with one of the safety systems.

So ... onto a Victoria train at Otford ... only to be delayed again at Swanley because of doors that wouldn't close on the rear carriage ...

Yet again my plan to leave home an hour before I had to was vindicated. My 70 minute journey to work took me 110 minutes this morning thanks to the inefficiencies of Southeastern Trains - perhaps they could learn something from my advanced planning?

 

Michelle Ward

Thu, 04 Feb 2010 3:43:19 am

The 1749 from London Bridge to Paddock Wood was cancelled for the third time in a week last night - apparently due to "an earlier train fault". Three trains later, and half an hour late, I got home. This seems to be becoming far too regular an occurrence!

 

Maxine

Fri, 05 Feb 2010 3:33:45 am

Since the beginning of January I have been unable to catch a direct train from London Victoria to Maidstone East when I finish work on Sunday evenings. The scheduled 22.45 train due at Maidstone an hour later has so far not materialised! Instead one has to change at Borough Green making the journey last 1 hour and 34 minutes. What happened to the direct train on offer in the new timetable?

So now we have engineering works EVERY Sunday? When I contacted SE about this, I received a two page drivel about Ebbsfleet and the high speed train! I don't bloody live in Ebbsfleet! I live in Maidstone!

 

Mumblina

Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:10:10 pm

1) Why does it take 1 hous and 15 minutes to get to London peak hours? For 38 miles in the year 2010 ?

2) Why is there a gap of almost 40 minutes am between certain rush hour services ?

3) Why are trains from London to Maidstone hourly after about 8.30pm?
In a 24 hour city ?

4) Why has the only decent, fast well used service to London Bridge been axed?

5) Why are South Eastern running virtually empty trains to St Pancras yet claim they cannot afford the fast London Bridge/ Charing Cross train ?

6) Why do South Eastern continue to cut carriages running numerous 4 car carriages resulting in overcrowding ?

7) Why do hundreds of people from Maidstone feel the need to add to traffic congestion and global warming by driving to Sevenoaks,Paddock Wood, Chatham, Sidcup, New Eltham, Mottingham,Chislehurst, Rochester amongst many other places?

8)WHY does Maidstone not have a train service fit for the year 2010? The trains are now slower, shorter, more overcrwded,irregular than ever before !

WHY DOES NOBODY FROM SOUTH EASTERN LISTEN?

 

Jean

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 2:11:36 am

I regularly used to travel from Maidstone East to London Bridge at least 3 times a week, and now having to go to Victoria instead I find really annoying, the train takes forever and then I still have to get to London Bridge, how can they justify taking all fast trains off to London Bridge? this is the county town of Kent for goodness sake!! I am absolutely disgusted!!!

 

Michelle Ward

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 2:27:30 am

The 0743 from Maidstone West missed the 0806 connection at Paddock Wood yet again this morning. This meant that to stand any chance of getting to work on time, London Bridge/Cannon Street passengers had to get the next train, which is fast to Waterloo East and Charing Cross, and therefore not a suitable connection. We cannot rely on Southeastern to get us to work on time any more, something that has become increasingly apparent over the past few months. And unfortunately, the only altnernative is slow overcrowed trains to Victoria - not a suitable option! The new timetable clearly does not work for Maidstone! And Southeastern's failure to make timetabled connections is just one of many examples as to why!

 

Kevin Parker

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 4:35:00 am

Well we had a near miss last week when the morning 7:43 from Maidstone East was 6 mins late, but this time the driver announced the Cannon Street service was 16 mins late so we did not have to worry.
Yesterday 17th Feb the 7:43 arrived at 7:46, sure enough as we pulled in to Paddock Wood the Cannon Street was on the other platform and as our doors opened its doors closed.
This morning once again the 7:43 arrived at 7:46, once again we arrived and the Cannon Street service was on the other platform, this time it was held on a red signal just long enough for the passengers to sprint over the bridge and pile on, luck more than judgement.
I was informed today that South Eastern have a policy that says that if the passengers can see the other service it must be held, the problem is the unhelpful so and so at Paddock Wood says as it is not an "official" connecting service he has no power to hold it and in any case he has no platform staff. One policy appears to contradict the other, it would be interesting to find out just what the policy is on this.

 

Michelle Ward

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 8:58:19 am

As stated by Kevin, above, we clearly need to establish not only what exactly the connection policy is, but also how we go about ensuring a reasonable policy is implemented.

It now seems that not only can we not rely on Southeastern to get us to work on time in the morning, but it's becoming increasingly apparent we cannot rely on them to get us home either.

A classic example of this was last night. The 1850 London Bridge to Ramsgate service was delayed en-route and as a result it arrived at Paddock Wood a few minutes after the 1940 connection back to Maidstone was due to depart...which, yet again, had already departed by the time we arrived. This left myself and the other affected commuters with no option but to wait almost an hour for the next service at 2040, on a lonely platform at a closed station in the freezing cold! This is not acceptable! It totally ruined my evening and when I eventually got home at the same time as I had the previous night (when I had stayed at work for another hour), I felt completely tired, frustrated and exasperated!

There were a number of passengers on the late running Ramsgate service reliant upon the 1940 connection at Paddock Wood, so it is not rocket science to work out that the connecting service should have been held until the connection was made.

I can only assume that I am paying Southeastern's increased fare prices for the privilege of having to spend more time than ever on their trains and platforms trying to get to and from work! And to add to the frustration, prior the removal of the fast Cannon Street to Maidstone East service I could have been home in 45 minutes, almost a third of the two hours and 10 minutes it took last night!

Short of buying a car, getting a local job or moving to another part of Kent (and the consequential impact each of these would have on my life), I am completely out of options. And I feel angry and frustrated that I am being forced to make such a drastic choice!

 

Mike Aronson

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 2:34:21 am

I think that Maidstone has been treated in this way because it is not considered a regeneration or 'growth' town unlike Gravesend, Medway or Ashford. The town is hence forgotten by these decision makers.

However, when I travel to the City from Maidstone East, I always change at Swanley for the train to Blackfriars. This to get closer to my destination and to avoid the usual hassle of Victoria.

 

Mark

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 7:02:19 am

I've read through everyone's comments (both critical and supportive.) I've commuted from Maidstone into the City for over 10 years. When I moved to Maidstone from Bromley we considered anywhere within a radius of an hour or so and specifically settled on Maidstone as it had excellent links into the City. Indeed many of the newer housing developments were marketed on being under an hour to London. I feel really sorry for anyone who has invested in a property in Maidstone in the last 3 or 4 years on that basis and is now not even in a position to sell without losing money on the property.

Effectively, what Southeastern have taken away with one hand they have taken away with the other. Rising prices, reduced services and the constant insistence that the best thing to do is use a High Speed service that takes 1/2hr to connect with, costs far too much to the average commuter and arrives at the wrong side of London.
Although, if you follow the advice of John MacQuarrie from the DfT the best train is a car. I think I'm inclined to agree with him. As the Franchise Manager for South Eastern he should know (and be ashamed of himself).

To try and rescue some of your sanities, for those of you who may not have tried, try running separate timetable searches from London Bridge to Sevenoaks, Sevenoaks to Otford and Otford to Maidstone East. There are some tight connections that go under the radar as they are less than 5 minutes. I use it most days and have been able to get from London Bridge to Maidstone East in 1h6m occasionally....

... assuming everything runs to time which is such a rare occurrence these days I am now keeping a time diary of every journey I make. I just need to know what to do with it. If anyone has a useful answer I'd be most grateful.

Good luck tomorrow and every day after that!

 

Annette Grimshaw

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 2:42:33 am

I used to be a commuter but now use the rail network for infrequent leisure travel. I lived in Tunbridge Wells until recently and cannot believe the difference between the T/W service to London and the Maidstone service. Maidstone is supposed to be the county town however the services are appalling. Now to add insult to injury they have removed the Maidstone to Charing Cross which is the service I always used. Charing Cross is more central than Victoria and this now adds 20 mins to my journey and an extra £5 to the cost. To make matters worse I consulted the National Rail Enquiries website prior to travelling which told me the Charing Cross service was still operating! As I had been misinformed I was unaware that my journey would take longer which meant that I was 20 mins late.

To summarise the service is dreadful, I have to pay more for it and they cant even update their own website let alone their customers. In future I will be driving to Falconwood to get the tube. At least I can park there and TFL seem to be a little more customer focused.

 

Kevin Parker

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 8:30:43 am

No train at all today, the 7:43 was cancelled, another lat day into the office.

 

Wendy

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 9:01:50 am

Maidstone is supposed to be the county town however the services are just appalling.
I live in Tovil, Maidstone. I work in the West End and start work at 8.30am. Not a great location to get a train but I can either take a 20 minute fast walk to Maidstone East to Victoria to catch a 6.45am train, or Maidstone West on the Medway Valley Line to catch the 6.30am train to Paddock Wood, then 6.53am train to Charing Cross. In order for me to get these trains I have to leave the house by 6.15am. Before the timetable changed I used to leave at 6.30am and catch trains which used to work like clockwork. 15 minutes precious time in the morning is a lot! The other choice is that I drive my car to Paddock Wood costing me more money. The train timetable used to work great for me getting to Charing Cross before the new timetable came out in December last year.
Now I’ve had to change my hours at work to suite the new timetable so I can be in work on time and leave work earlier to get a decent train home and be home before 8.00pm.

To summarise the service it is dreadful, I have to pay more for it. Why didn’t you just leave it alone. If something works don’t break it!!!!

 

Rob Cartlidge

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:48:53 am

I've just been sitting on the 17:45 service from city thameslink to ashford and heard the words "will the conductor please contact the driver" !!
It turns out that my journey home to Maidstone is again disrupted as now we have been diverted to paddock wood!!!
This service is a joke since the timetable change and I am already planning to move. I have been travelling to the city from Maidstone and this is the worst it has been.
I am disgusted that we have to pay more for this awful service

 

Michael Southgate

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 2:36:51 am

I Live in Leeds and havent even bothered with the local services which are vastly overpriced and appallingly serviced. Instead I drive 30 minutes to a "Metro" service where I can park for free, enjoy a slightly less costly ticket and total commute time of 1:30....

Sadly I am recently arrived in Leeds but I hope this is not what I have to do for ever. Bring back the Bearstead-Cannon Street train today!!!!!

 

Antony

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 3:46:21 am

A side issue for some perhaps but part of the journey experience on Southeastern. I wonder if anyone else feels that the number of public announcements on trains is excessive, and delivered at a volume that is intrusive? I have written several times to Southeastern to request that the announcements be reduced in number and volume, but to no avail. I pointed out that a five-day weekly commuter from Maidstone East to Brixton is subject to 320 announcements, which in my view are fatuous and intrusive. In their reply Southeastern acknowledged that the announcements can be "extremely irritating" (their words) but they did not intend to change their policy as these were of benefit to deaf and blind pssengers. I did not miss the opportunity of pointing out that these announcements were of extremely little value to the deaf, not to mention those of sound hearing. Will common sense ever prevail?

 

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 4:37:52 am

Southeastern are starting to come to the attention of the media and these stories will really help to push them into the limelight for just how poor their service has been not just since the new timetable.

 

Richard Purves

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 8:45:45 am

The Dirty Tricks Department at Southeastern were working overtime this morning (15-Mar-2010).
The four carriage 09:18, Maidstone East to Victoria, arrived as usual but this time with one carriage 'Locked Off' for a school trip. They've actually found a way of running a three carriage train!
Needless to say 'Standing Room Only' took on a whole new meaning. If they carry on like this they will need to employ train packers at each station just to get the doors shut.

 

David

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 6:03:48 am

Something needs to be done, Maidstone and other stations along that line, needs a quick and reliable service into the city. I am seriously considering moving to a place with better connections.

South Eastern are a disagrace, they over charge for a bad service into a next to useless station in London. If we were from another country we would have taken direct action against them.

Maybe its time to try something that will make them take notice!!

 

Stephanie

Tue, 06 Apr 2010 5:44:43 am

I am thinking of moving to Maidstone and would like some honest feedback on the train journeys from Maidstone East or Maidstone West (as I can get to my offices from Victoria or St Pancras). As Maidstone is a new area to me, my buying a property in the area depends solely on the train service.

Your honest and valued advice is greatly appreciated.

Thank you

 

Andrew Williams

Wed, 07 Apr 2010 1:06:41 am

Well it's really time to cut to the chase, especially when there are those that suggest we should just grin and bear the perpetual delays and lack of communication. Since the removal of the direct service from Maidstone East to Cannon St/London Bridge in December, the remaining services have peculiarly got much worse. It means that many of us are unfortunately reliant on the Paddock Wood to Maidstone West service which especially at night is appalling. At least once a week the London train (typically the 18.50 from London Bridge) is delayed so that we miss the connection with the 19.40 from Paddock Wood to M/West. More often than not the London train gets in to Paddock Wood at 19.41 say or 19.42 but the 19.40 has already left. When you ask a guard they say that there may or may not have been communication between the respective drivers - sometimes there is and the train waits for a couple of minutes, but far more often the 19.40 has left. Two Wednesdays ago we got in to Paddock Wood at 19.41 having been stuck right outside Paddock Wood for 5 minutes but no-one had bothered to communicate so the 19.40 had already left. So we were all left stranded at Paddock Wood in the pi**ing rain and there were so many people that it was impossible for most of us to get a cab. So most of us waited an hour for the next service. Yet another night when you don't get to see your kids or loved ones because someone couldn't care less and couldn't be bothered to get the connecting train to wait for 1 minute. Quite simply, how do we get the train drivers/guards to communicate? As I've said, if we ask them face to face on the train they just sidestep the issue and say that "sometimes it haoppens, sometimes it doesn't". Such nonchalance will only continue to fuel the anger and disdain that we all feel as it is.

The other point is that the trains are now ridiculously packed like never before - someone with a modicum of intelligence might have thought to add extra carriages in light of the fact there's all the people from the pre-Christmas 2009 Maidstone East - London Bridge/Cannon Street line cramming in to the remaining services. In some cases the number of carriages have been reduced!

Thanks for your attention.

 

Thu, 08 Apr 2010 3:25:11 pm

Hi Stephanie

Maidstone East to Victoria is ok, the train takes an hour but there are no changes.

You can't currently get to St Pancras from Maidstone West directly, you would have to change somewhere to get the high speed link which is not great and would be costly.

The service since December 2009 has been particuarly bad. It all depends on what you accept is a decent service, over an hour to Victoria on a busy train isn't great but the upside is the service is direct.

Have a good look at the timetables before you commit

MARUG

 

Kevin Parker

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 7:37:32 am

Well we are slowly plunging backwards again, we had one 7 43 from Maidstone West cancelled. The last week had one in late it arrived at 7 46, the Driver told us not to worry he had spoken to the staff at Maidstone West and he was going to call Paddock Wood and get them to hold the on time 8 06 Cannon Street.
He was joking right? I mean we know the guy at Paddock Wood does not consider these to be connecting services, he has told us he has no platform staff and no inclination to move his backside out of his nice ticket box so we were not hopeful. Those of us who are used to the "helpful" staff at Paddock Wood watched in panic as the two trains arrived at the same time, we dashed across the bridge and as we charged down heard the dreaded beeping of the doors of the Cannon Street train close, we yelled at the guard who was a little slow getting onboard and he released the doors saying "no one had told him" were we surprised? No we were not, but they got us back next day when the 8 06 was cancelled!

 

Dave

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 1:27:01 pm

Does anybody know how we can influence the awarding of the franchise when up for renewal and bring to the authorities attention the complete contempt with which South Eastern treats Maidstone commuters? Surely we have a voice in this ?

 

Andy

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:30:10 pm


Regarding the problems that people are having with the 7:43 Maidstone West service and the tight connection at Paddock Wood. From the 23 May this train will be leaving from Maidstone West 2mins earlier to connect with the 8:06 from Paddock Wood. Details at : http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/index.php/news/news_items/view/146

 

Kevin Parker

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 6:55:18 am

Andy,
Thanks for that, I was aware they were moving the train back a generous 2 minutes, just as well given that on Friday we had another day when the 7:43 arrived at 7:46 and by the time we arrived at Paddock Wood the 8:06 had been and gone.
I still think that even at 7:37 it is going to be touch and go on occasions.

 

Jonathan

Wed, 05 May 2010 10:22:53 am

Hi,

Just to give a different experience - I live in London and commute to Maidstone every day - the journey since December has been mostly fine, with some newer trains with tables, plus a rapid train leaving at 18.40 that takes 35 minutes to Bromley South! However the axeing of the popular Charing Cross trains at 1648 and 1748 is bad news - when you could previously go to London Bridge in 45 minutes for some drinks after work - it now takes 1hr 20 + via Victoria, or walking between Bromley S and Bromley N. I have also tried getting off at St Mary Cray and getting the bus to Orpington for the fast train to London Bridge. This will probably will work well once they have stopped digging up Orpington High Street (the two are 10 minutes ride away on a good day). The lack of Charing Cross train is a disadvantage for business people and commuters working in Maidstone and again portrays the town's accessibility in a bad light.

 

John

Tue, 11 May 2010 1:28:38 pm

Nothing that the utterly useless train company shocks me any more. About a month ago there was a fatality in the West Malling area. I was surprised when SET divirted the train from Bromley South to Paddock Wood to allow people to get to the Maidstone area. Very impressed until I got to Paddock Wood (very exposed to the elements) on a cold wet night with around 30 other passengers. They never held the connection at Paddock Wood (this line hardly ever runs on time) which meant we had to wait for an hour and ten minutes (running ten mins late) in the cold. What they should of done was stop at Tonbridge where the Strood service starts. We could of sat on a train in the warm at a station with a coffee shop. When the train turned up late there was no apology. There must be a way of getting rid of SET altogether? It is such a poor company at ever level, a total failure. Now when my train is late and there is no annoucements I make a point of asking the guard why we are late, they are employed to assist us after all.

 

Mon, 24 May 2010 6:07:41 am

I experienced problems that night with Paddock Wood too, and I was in a rush for a important appointment so I had to ring a freind who lived 10 miles away to come and give me a lift. Not impressed at all.

Karen

 

Kevin Parker

Tue, 29 Jun 2010 6:46:48 am

Well I have let the last few painful journeys slide by, but once again Monday 28th the 7:41 arrived at 7:48, once again we were given no explanation and needless to say we missed the Cannon Street service at Paddock Wood.
However some good news appears to be that after the failure to hold the Cannon street earlier in the month when despite the staff at Maidstone West speaking to both the main control and Paddock Wood, and the failure once again to hold the service despite arriving just as the Cannon Street moved off, we do seem to have staff on the platform of late.
Time will tell whether the Paddock Wood manager has now conceded that this is a connecting service or whether he is just enjoying the good weather only time will tell.

 

Kevin Parker

Tue, 13 Jul 2010 4:37:26 am

Another day another complaint to South eastern:-

Once again we have had another example of the timetable failing. The 7:41 in to Maidstone West was delayed due to being held at Strood and the ongoing speed restrictions on a section of the line. The train arrived at Paddock Wood just as the 8:06 Cannon Street service arrived on the other platform. As the doors opened we all ran for the bridge to take us over to the other platform the first couple of passengers running across the bridge only got half way before the doors closed and the Cannon Street train was allowed to leave.
The station manager at Paddock Wood announced over the PA that he had asked if he could hold the Cannon street and was told "No".
Why? Passengers are risking injury running for a service that should be held. The staff are willing to be helpful and we are talking about a service that is usually held at Tonbridge in any case.

 

Kevin Parker

Tue, 13 Jul 2010 4:38:48 am

This was the response to the same problem on the 9th July:-

Dear Mr Parker

Thank you for your website comment dated 30 June that we received.

I am sorry that you missed your connection when travelling from Maidstone West to London Cannon Street. I appreciate how frustrating this must have been. I also regret the problems that this caused you.

I should reassure you that train planners do their best to co-ordinate services as appropriately as possible. Although we will always do our best to ensure that there is time for passengers from one train to catch another train at the same station, I hope you will appreciate that on our very busy and complex network they cannot schedule every train we run to conveniently connect with another. While we would ideally like to be able to hold all trains that serve as possible connections, I am afraid that this is not possible because of the nature of the integrated operation of railway passenger services.

If we were to hold connecting trains, we will first of all be delaying the passengers who have already boarded this train, who may have connections to catch further down the line, and we also have to bear in mind the fact that, whenever a train is delayed, there will be a knock-on effect to later services, causing more inconvenience to more passengers. Having said this, I can assure you that we make every effort to take all circumstances into consideration where such matters are concerned. Our timetable planning team regularly review the timetable to ensure that there is adequate time for passengers to connect with trains, and we will make alterations to increase connecting times between trains whenever possible.

I will ensure that your concerns are brought to their attention for future consideration. Our Senior Managers also analyse all feedback that we receive, and they subsequently investigate solutions that can attend to the issues raised. In addition our Operations Managers’ review the performance of our network regularly and identify any problem areas. Considering this, I do hope that you don’t encounter such difficulties again. I also hope that you will accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience that you suffered.


Yours sincerely

 

Trevor Smith

Thu, 15 Jul 2010 7:04:55 am

ONCE AGAIN - FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME THIS YEAR ALONE I AND MY FELLOW PASSENGERS- I HATE THE TERM CUSTOMERS- HAVE HAD TO ENDURE A ALMOST 3 HOUR JOURNEY INTO LONDON BECAUSE- ONCE AGAIN!- POINTS FAILURE. WE HAD TO TAKE AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE INTO LONDON VIA THIS STATION AND CHANGE AT THAT STATION...YOU KNOW THE SCENARIO. AND NO ONE SEEMS TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON WHEN YOU ASK Q'S LOKE "HOW LONG DO THINK THIS IS GOING TO TAKE TO FIX?" ONLY LAST WEEK I GOT HELD UP ON THE WAY HOME BECAUSE OF "A TREE ON THE LINE"- AGAIN!!!MY ANNUAL TICKET HAS COST ME ALMOST THREE AND A HALF GRAND AND STILL RISING AND FOR THAT I AM NOT ALLOWED TO USE THE HSI AS IT STATES "NOT VALID ON HSI" NUFF SED! TREVOR SMITH MR ANGRY OF MAIDSTONE

 

Mike Sheerman

Thu, 15 Jul 2010 1:52:53 pm

Dear Sir /Madam

Why is the service from Maidstone to London so poor ? 10 years ago it took less than an hour. It now takes 25% longer !!!!

I understand the 'fast service' from Ebsfleet is disgracefully underused whilst the rest of us cram on to inadequate, overcrowded trains for a journey which takes twice as long as it should.

I hope the coalition government reviews this situation and how this train company treats its 'customers'

Bring back Connex!

 



Leave a Reply